• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: syntax, model
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:31:55 -0400
• Cc: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10103B949@R...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10103B949@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> Since the types of the Street, Country and PostalCode elements is
> xs:anyType meaning they can have any content I'm assuming Rich means
> that there isn't enough information there to do much processing with.  

Exactly.

Based on his most recent note, I think Simon et al agree with Tyler. 
When XML folks use "data model" they meen round-tripping between native 
data types and XML.  Tyler's viewing it more abstractly (no surprise, no 
that UML is mentioned :), and therefore really means "syntax" in XML-speak.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • RE: syntax, model
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: syntax, model: nonsense
• Next by Date: RE: syntax, model
• Previous by thread: RE: syntax, model
• Next by thread: RE: syntax, model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread