• To: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Subject: Re: Beyond Ontologies
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:12:28 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <046e01c38836$9de66740$6601a8c0@snobird>
• References: <r02000200-1028-8B1B028EF41711D7B7360003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <046e01c38836$9de66740$6601a8c0@snobird>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Bob Foster scripsit:

> But relationships do change all the time. <#Simon> :sonOf_:1 is as good an
> example as any. I assume the 1 is intended to be the cardinality, so the
> relationship might be better named sonOfFather. 

No, no.  <#Simon> :sonOf _:1 (note that you dropped a space) uses _:1 as
a label for an anonymous node, the equivalent of an existentially quantified
variable.  In plain English, it says "Simon is the son of someone."

-- 
"[T]he Unicode Standard does not encode         John Cowan
idiosyncratic, personal, novel, or private      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
use characters, nor does it encode logos        http://www.reutershealth.com
or graphics."                                   jcowan@r...

• References:
  • Re: Beyond Ontologies
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Beyond Ontologies
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xml-dev by RSS
• Next by Date: Re: Beyond Ontologies
• Previous by thread: Re: Beyond Ontologies
• Next by thread: Re: Beyond Ontologies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread