• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:29:06 -0400
• In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-248BFA7404D611D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <20031022211207.GB24300@w...> <r02000200-1028-248BFA7404D611D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:24:38PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> I don't think consensus is to be expected at this point.  This would
> just be showing ideas and seeing which people have similar enough ideas
> that perhaps they should work together.  After five plus years we
> finally have a fair number of people asking questions - that seems like
> a good signal that it's time to start experimenting.

That makes sense to me.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/

• References:
  • Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Parser vs. XML Processor?
• Next by Date: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Next by thread: Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread