• To: Seairth Jacobs <seairth@s...>
• Subject: Re: UTF-8+names
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 14:17:09 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <002701c395ab$41617c80$a600a8c0@SeairthA31>
• References: <3F917A29.1000708@t...> <002701c395ab$41617c80$a600a8c0@SeairthA31>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Seairth Jacobs wrote:

> From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>
> 
>>Check out http://tbray.org/tag/utf-8+names.html
> 
> 
> Instead of throwing an error for a missing semicolon, why not let that case
> fall under section 4. 

Sounds sensible to me.

> Also, I suspect that using the same format as XML/SGML's references is going
> to confuse people.  Maybe use a similary format such as #name; or @name;.
> This way, at least the two references (UTF-8+name and XML) would not be
> confused.

I disagree.  People seem to like XML's syntax, but simultaneously they 
don't want to have to carry a DTD around, and this proposal is designed 
to address exactly that. -Tim

• References:
  • UTF-8+names
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: RE: UTF-8+names
• Next by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread