Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold) writes: >The examples of XUL and XAML presented here both mix presentation >information directly with the markup. Neither is superior in this >regard. Thus, to the extent that CSS is directly embedded in the >structure here, for good or bad, XAML's syntax is more appropriate >than XUL's. I disagree. Even in the case of the style attribute, I'm happier to see presentation information segregated than I am to see "more appropriate" XML syntax. Even in XML documents, XML syntax isn't always appropriate, for a wide variety of reasons. In this particular case, I see Microsoft crushing yet another standard it doesn't control and doesn't much like, so I have even less sympathy for the argument than usual. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
