• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>, "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@d...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 12:23:53 -0400
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1D51618@R...>

At 08:21 AM 10/10/2003 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>Really, and what spec would define how you perform operations on these 
>types? The XQuery working group has already had a painful time dealing 
>with the fact that when the W3C XML Schema working group created their 
>type system not enough emphasis was placed on defining operations on these 
>types just validation.

Fine.  So creators of types need to define operations on them as 
well.  Sounds good to me - something that the WXS crew would have done well 
to think about.

I'd rather not let the pain the WXS data types have caused for other 
working groups stand as a barrier to getting datatypes done right.

• References:
  • RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
• Next by Date: Re: Preserving the structure of the XML file
• Previous by thread: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
• Next by thread: RE: fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWorking Group
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread