• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: UTF-8+names
• From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:54:40 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3F92ADDB.70001@t...>
• References: <200310191350.OAA21108@e3000> <3F92ADDB.70001@t...>

* Tim Bray wrote:
>David Carlisle wrote:
>
>> My reading was that < _is_ defined in utf8+names as it _is_ defined in
>> html and mathml but the result is still that the result is well formed,
>> but has utf8+names expansion  < rather than <.
>
>You're partially right, < is defined by old-fashioned (SGML-based) 
>HTML but it's *not* defined by XHTML or MathML.

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#vc-entdeclared
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-special.ent

• References:
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by thread: RE: UTF-8+names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread