• To: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Subject: Re: UTF-8+names
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:59:05 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200310192101.05193.miles@m...>
• References: <20031019034635.91162.qmail@w...> <3F92A169.60903@p...> <20031019171750.GI20059@m...> <200310192101.05193.miles@m...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Miles Sabin scripsit:

> Hmm ... but you _do_ allow monstrosities like this,
> 
>   <?xml encoding&=;"UTF-8+names"?>
> 
> How would that get along with Appendix F style encoding detection?

It would hose it, as many other encodings both extant and hypothetical
have the power to do (UTF-7 and JOECODE, respectively). That's why
App F isn't normative.

-- 
John Cowan      jcowan@r...        http://www.reutershealth.com
        "Not to know The Smiths is not to know K.X.U."  --K.X.U.

• References:
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
  • Re: UTF-8+names
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8+names
• Previous by thread: Re: Entity support in XML parsers (was: UTF-8+names)
• Next by thread: Re: UTF-8+names
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread