• To: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Subject: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• From: Berend de Boer <berend@x...>
• Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 08:13:44 +1300
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <200310040807.58719.miles@m...> (Miles Sabin'smessage of "Sat, 4 Oct 2003 08:07:58 +0100")
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0310032027200.23488-100000@s...><200310040807.58719.miles@m...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (windows-nt)

>>>>> "Miles" == Miles Sabin <miles@m...> writes:

    Miles> Fair enough. But just how "new" is that new ASN.1 code? If
    Miles> it was completely original code with no borrowings from
    Miles> SSLeay and still reproduced the same or very similar bugs,
    Miles> and those bugs were intrinsically related to ASN.1 rather
    Miles> than being, eg., generic integer overflows, then that'd be
    Miles> good evidence that there was a general problem with ASN.1.

Or related the the language used...

-- 
Regards,

Berend. (-:

• References:
  • Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Reductionist vs Holistic Semantics
• Next by Date: RE: Reductionist vs Holistic Semantics
• Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• Next by thread: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread