• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• From: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>
• Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:23:00 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200310032122.01031.miles@m...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9ED55@h...> <E1A5Vo4-0002wr-00@canteen> <200310032122.01031.miles@m...>

On Friday 03 October 2003 16:22, Miles Sabin wrote:
> > > Personally, based on a mild acquaintance with with the OpenSSL
> > > source, I think the bulk of the responsibility for the recent and
> > > not so recent OpenSSL flaws lies neither with the design of
> > > ASN1/[BDPX]ER, nor with sloppy coders, but with a large and by now
> > > somewhat crufty legacy codebase.
> >
> > Everybody gets crufty eventually. The design must cope with that.
>
> Now you're just being silly.

Trying to design a maintainable legacy codebase is silly?

Tyler

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• References:
  • RE: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
    • From: Tyler Close <tyler@w...>
  • Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• Next by Date: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• Next by thread: Re: Fwd: [e-lang] Protocol implementation errors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread