Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
K. Ari Krupnikov scripsit: > I have a master RNG file that describes general properties of my > grammar, and individual RNG files that describe individual > elements. The master file <include>s the individual ones. Do you have them separated out merely for ease of maintenance, or do you anticipate using different contents for the individual files? > Question 1: is this a good way of > doing things in RELAX NG, or should I consider a better alternative? The obvious alternative would be to avoid the machinery of "define" combination, and simply use externalRef to bring in the element patterns directly. This is somewhat more streamlined. > Question 2: I need to add declarations that would be common to all > members of a particular class. An obvious way is to have every element > <ref> the common declarations (a group of attributes in this > case). Can I do it in one place? DTDs don't provide such a mechanism, > XSD does (thought inheritance). I don't see that it's any better or worse to have to ref common subpatterns than to have to specify a common base type. -- Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan in any language. --Allen Brown jcowan@r...
|
