• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: the yin/yang web, was: Re: xml schema and OWL
• From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:05:03 -0400
• Cc: leb27@d..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.2.20030930154224.01dc9c10@n...>
• References: <1272f711275e99.1275e991272f71@d...> <6.0.0.22.2.20030930154224.01dc9c10@n...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2

Jonathan Robie wrote:

> ... XML Schema and OWL are not two parts of some integrated system, 
> they live in largely separate universes.

This article is a nice discussion of the issues: 
http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/231/

Jonathan

• References:
  • xml schema and OWL
    • From: leb27@d...
  • Re: xml schema and OWL
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schema and ontologies
• Next by Date: Re: xml schema and OWL
• Previous by thread: RE: xml schema and OWL
• Next by thread: Looking for Schema for Requirements and Specifications Manual(s)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread