• To: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>
• Subject: Re: some days I'm wrong
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:21:04 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <878yobbc6n.fsf@n...>
• References: <r02000000-1026-2EC9D7CEEAEA11D7B3530003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <878yobbc6n.fsf@n...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Norman Walsh scripsit:

> That is: RELAX NG has an XML syntax, the XML syntax was designed
> first, and the language works as an XML grammar. The compact syntax is
> a (carefully designed, thoughtfully conceived) add-on.

I don't know that it's essential to your point that the XML syntax was
designed first (for all we know, James was fiddling with some sort of
compact syntax before he ever issued TREX, never mind RELAX NG).
I agree that it's important to have an XML syntax as well as the
compact syntax, though I have always authored in the compact syntax
even before it was official.

-- 
MEET US AT POINT ORANGE AT MIDNIGHT BRING YOUR DUCK OR PREPARE TO FACE WUGGUMS
John Cowan   http://www.reutershealth.com   jcowan@r...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: some days I'm wrong
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Re: some days I'm wrong
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: some days I'm wrong
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• References:
  • some days I'm wrong
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: some days I'm wrong
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A Few Thoughts on an Ontology as a Self Organizing System
• Next by Date: Re: A Few Thoughts on an Ontology as a Self Organizing System
• Previous by thread: Re: "Have a canonical XML representation even if the usualnotation isn't XML", was: Re: some days I'm wrong
• Next by thread: Re: some days I'm wrong
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread