• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: xml namespace prefix resolution
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 23:28:08 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r02000000-1026-A533E72CE97C11D7870D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1AFD9B8@R...> <r02000000-1026-A533E72CE97C11D7870D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:
> dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo) writes:
> >Of course, neither DOM nor SAX is actually based on the XML Infoset so
> >it is unsurprising that they don't expose such functionality but this
> >doesn't mean that it has anything to do with the PSVI. 

Actually, the Infoset is based on DOM and SAX, and also the XPath
data model.  I was there, and I know.

-- 
"Kill Gorg)Bûn!  Kill orc-folk!           John Cowan
No other words please Wild Men.         jcowan@r...
Drive away bad air and darkness         http://www.reutershealth.com
with bright iron!"  --Gh)Bân-buri-Ghân    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

• References:
  • RE: xml namespace prefix resolution
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • RE: xml namespace prefix resolution
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml namespace prefix resolution
• Next by Date: Re: Binary XML (AKA "spawn of the devil")
• Previous by thread: RE: xml namespace prefix resolution
• Next by thread: Re: xml namespace prefix resolution
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread