• To: Christian Nentwich <christian@s...>
• Subject: Re: file extensions best practice
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:41:21 -0400
• Cc: xml dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1197291424.20030902115035@s...>
• References: <1197291424.20030902115035@s...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Christian Nentwich scripsit:

> - The space for 3 digit file prefixes is small, and ours would look
> like .x?? which make sthe space even smaller

There is no reason why the suffix needs to be only three letters any more,
except backward compatibility with pre-Win95 versions of Windows.  No
other living file system has such a constraint.

-- 
There are three kinds of people in the world:   John Cowan
those who can count,                            http://www.reutershealth.com
and those who can't.                            jcowan@r...

• References:
  • file extensions best practice
    • From: Christian Nentwich <christian@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Canonical XML Test suite
• Next by Date: SD2003 West Call for Papers
• Previous by thread: Re: file extensions best practice
• Next by thread: Re: file extensions best practice
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread