• To: "Brian Speight" <bspeight@t...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML Schema: nillable vs. minOccurs
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:02:44 -0700
• Thread-index: AcOB8RHksgr2wlXfQJyRJSt1A/xGyQAAup6g
• Thread-topic: XML Schema: nillable vs. minOccurs

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Speight [mailto:bspeight@t...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:38 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject:  XML Schema: nillable vs. minOccurs
> 
> All, 
> 
> I'm looking for advice on usage of nillable vs. minOccurs. 
> When you have an element that is optional should you use 
> "nillable=true" or "minOccurs=0" or both? Using both seems to 
> make things more complicated than necessary. 

I'd use minOccurs="0", nillable just complicates matters. For example,
an element can have xsi:nil="true" in the instance and still have all
its attributes.  

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Flashlight batteries never die in the daylight hours.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

 

• Prev by Date: Re: relax ng public list?
• Next by Date: Re: relax ng public list?
• Previous by thread: XML Schema: nillable vs. minOccurs
• Next by thread: RE: XML Schema: nillable vs. minOccurs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread