• To: 'Jonathan Robie' <jonathan.robie@d...>, leb27@d..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: xml schema and OWL
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:29:54 -0500

You might consider automated transforms.  It is glue 
but one could question the need for two definitions 
if they are equivalent in expression unless one 
is a record of authority and/or is richer such that 
say, the XML Schema is a downtranslation.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@d...]


At 03:38 PM 9/30/2003, leb27@d... wrote:
>Hi everyone:
>
>How do I tell an XML schema that the only possible values of an element 
>could come from members of a class with some properties defined in an OWL 
>ontology?
>
>My concern is not to duplicate efforts by writing a list of possible 
>values in an xml schema and again in an OWL ontology.

XML Schema doesn't know anything about OWL, so if you want a set of values 
to be treated as an enumeration for the purposes of XML Schema validation, 
you will have to create such an enumeration in the XML Schema language.

Yes, this duplicates effort, but XML Schema and OWL are not two parts of 
some integrated system, they live in largely separate universes.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml schema and OWL
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Managing Innovation
• Next by Date: Re: asserting filesystem structure with xpaths
• Previous by thread: asserting filesystem structure with xpaths
• Next by thread: Re: xml schema and OWL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread