• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: ISO turns evil?
• From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>
• Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:18:27 -0400
• In-reply-to: <200309212036.VAA15549@e3000>
• References: <16237.39188.383221.988134@m...><200309212036.VAA15549@e3000>

David Carlisle writes:

 > > Apologies if this has come up already and I missed it, but is ISO
 > > really seriously considering charging royalties for the *use* of
 > > their standards?
 > 
 > Not considering, it is their current policy:
 > 
 > 
 > http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/index.html
 > 
 > ...The use of ISO 3166-1 in commercial products may be subject to a
 > licence fee.....

Thanks for the link.  That's a lot more than an incipient discussion,
if they're already running a warning.


All the best,


David

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ISO turns evil?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • ISO turns evil?
    • From: David Megginson <dmeggin@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ISO turns evil?
• Next by Date: Re: ISO turns evil?
• Previous by thread: Re: ISO turns evil?
• Next by thread: Re: ISO turns evil?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread