• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: some days I'm wrong
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:54:07 -0400
• In-reply-to: <878yobbc6n.fsf@n...>

ndw@n... (Norman Walsh) writes:
>That is: RELAX NG has an XML syntax, the XML syntax was designed
>first, and the language works as an XML grammar. The compact syntax is
>a (carefully designed, thoughtfully conceived) add-on.

That's a great way of looking at it, and I think you're right that it's
important.  It fits well with my general preference that things have a
canonical XML representation even if the usual notation isn't XML, as
well.

• Follow-Ups:
  • "Have a canonical XML representation even if the usual notation isn'tXML", was: Re: some days I'm wrong
    • From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>

• References:
  • Re: some days I'm wrong
    • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: some days I'm wrong
• Next by Date: A Few Thoughts on an Ontology as a Self Organizing System
• Previous by thread: Re: some days I'm wrong
• Next by thread: "Have a canonical XML representation even if the usual notation isn'tXML", was: Re: some days I'm wrong
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread