• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: OCLC turns evil (was ISO turns evil?)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:15:06 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9ECB1@h...>

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>While this creates 
>uncertainty, it creates opportunity and the opportunistic will pursue 
>these.

That's all well and good for corporations fulfilling their fiduciary
responsibility by transferring cash from anyone who has it to their
shareholders, but it's not what people expect of organizations which are
set up for the explicit purpose of encouraging sharing.

The contradiction is sadly breathtaking.

http://oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/3791

• References:
  • RE: OCLC turns evil (was ISO turns evil?)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: relax ng public list?
• Next by Date: RE: ISO turns evil?
• Previous by thread: RE: OCLC turns evil (was ISO turns evil?)
• Next by thread: RE: OCLC turns evil (was ISO turns evil?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread