• To: "pop3" <lbradshaw@d...>,<lbradshaw@d...>,"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Subject: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 08:48:44 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcNrH5uYRNzFVrkCSqeNwAZd3SHHJwAAMGW8
• Thread-topic: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?

The original statement made to you is a bogus claim. I assume someone was trying to sell you some software? 

________________________________

From: pop3 [mailto:lbradshaw@d...]
Sent: Mon 8/25/2003 8:31 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo; lbradshaw@d...; Chiusano Joseph
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE:  A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?




If XML is about data interchange, then there is no reason it should support
the RM, I think.

But that was not the original premise. The original statement made to me
was that an XML only solution (XML, XML tools like TeraText et. al) is a
better technological and business solution than a relational database
solution for an application with massive data stores and massive document
stores, as in terabytes of each, where the two intertwine and interelate.

• Prev by Date: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
• Next by Date: RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Previous by thread: RE: XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?)
• Next by thread: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread