• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: opposite of infoset
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@d...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:25:12 -0500
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <r02000000-1026-3E2022B0D32F11D7A2D00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]> <3F43AC4C.8090800@e...>

> > "Text" doesn't quite seem appropriate, nor does "serialization",
> > "markup", or "XML".
>
> I agree that text and serialization don't cut it well, but what do you
find
> wrong with markup or XML? They both seem fine to me.

Perhaps syntactic? Markup seemed okay to me as well...

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • opposite of infoset
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: opposite of infoset
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: opposite of infoset
• Next by Date: RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• Previous by thread: Re: opposite of infoset
• Next by thread: Re: opposite of infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread