Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit: > That is what some are trying to work out. One common approach is to > ensure that each document in the process covers the contingencies > for the next step. For example, the workshop is a little dangerous > if any of the presenters provide information which taints further > work. In an RFP, one details all obligations for submission including > for example, recognition that the submitting the material obligates > the submittor to the IP policies of the organization posting the > RFP. The trouble is that (especially with patents) there may be submarines which neither RFP creator nor proposer is aware of. Your only defense against this is general anti-patent insurance. -- The Imperials are decadent, 300 pound John Cowan <jcowan@r...> free-range chickens (except they have http://www.reutershealth.com teeth, arms instead of wings and http://www.ccil.org/~cowan dinosaurlike tails). --Elyse Grasso
|
