• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: InkML
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 16:55:48 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC81A@h...>

clbullar@i... (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>I agree.  Checkbox compatibility is a good phrase to 
>describe this kind of design.

Good to hear.

On the issue of coordinates, I think InkML may at least have a case that
its coordinates are different from others.

Take a look at the table in:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-InkML-20030806/#traceFormat

They're including tilt, yaw, pitch, pressure.  Lots of stuff beyond
coordinates, though maybe this is really describing vectors, not
something necessarily specific to pens.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: InkML
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: Re: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question)
• Previous by thread: RE: InkML
• Next by thread: RE: InkML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread