• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
• From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
• Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 13:08:01 +0200
• Organization: nil
• References: <r02000000-1026-8E9E6C0EC42411D794470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• Reply-to: james.anderson@s...

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> 
> [> >> and > are james anderson.  >> is Simon St.Laurent.]
> 
> ...
> 
> >what was that term which popped up earlier for, among other things
> >"disposed to go counter to what is required"?
> 
> Dunno.  I think I lost track when you were complaining about the
> slowness of pencil sharpeners. :)
> 

and, there, i thought you might have been lulled to sleep[1], or driven to
distraction[2] while you were waiting for your job to print.

...

[1] http://www.computerhistory.org/exhibits/highlights/1403_blue_danube.mp3
[2] http://www.computerhistory.org/exhibits/highlights/1403_ambient.mp3

• References:
  • Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re[2]: DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook
• Next by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Previous by thread: Re: reaching humans (was Re: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?)
• Next by thread: multiple schemas, annotations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread