• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: opposite of infoset
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:50:48 -0700
• Thread-index: AcNnRhSpctungJZ4SMyciKP8n2ewsAAFqdwl
• Thread-topic: Re: opposite of infoset

+1 
 
We use lexical amongst ourselves at work when describing the other side of the infoset view of XML. 

________________________________

From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
Sent: Wed 8/20/2003 10:45 AM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  Re: opposite of infoset



dnovatchev@y... (Dimitre Novatchev) writes:
>What about "lexical" ?

Perfect.  I'll have to explain it, but it's definitely clean. 

Don't know how that one got past me - I've certainly used it before.

Thanks!

--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• Prev by Date: Re: opposite of infoset
• Next by Date: RE: opposite of infoset
• Previous by thread: RE: opposite of infoset
• Next by thread: Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread