• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: opposite of infoset
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:45:41 -0400
• In-reply-to: <bi0b5o$dkb$1@s...>

dnovatchev@y... (Dimitre Novatchev) writes:
>What about "lexical" ?

Perfect.  I'll have to explain it, but it's definitely clean.  

Don't know how that one got past me - I've certainly used it before.

Thanks!

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: opposite of infoset
    • From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@y...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• Next by Date: RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• Previous by thread: Re: opposite of infoset
• Next by thread: Re: opposite of infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread