• To: 'John Cowan' <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 15:10:24 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Right.  Is that a fair use?  Xerox machines are 
provided in libraries.  It probably isn't but wouldn't 
that mean some adjustments need to be made to the 
fair use provisions?

Oops.  Promised Dare I'd not post any more off topic questions.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]

Google maintains a cache (in fact, quite a lot of them) that contains
snapshots of the whole Web, thus making hash of the notion that
copyright owners get to control the making of copies.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• Next by Date: Help with Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• Next by thread: Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread