• To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• Subject: Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:47:11 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <014301c361a5$be6712b0$b6f5d3ce@s...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC7AE@h...> <0f9e01c36120$a45d94f0$6701a8c0@snobird> <3F396AE3.D9D5A506@b...> <014301c361a5$be6712b0$b6f5d3ce@s...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Jonathan Borden scripsit:

> XML Schema thus provides a form of semantics to the XML document, i.e. that
> such element content is to be treated as a decimal number. Now that isn't an
> all encompassing semantics for the document, but it is not intended to,
> rather to add basic type information to element or attribute content. 

"Content is fancy form."
	--Douglas R. Hofstadter

-- 
"Well, I'm back."  --Sam        John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>
  • Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
  • Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• Next by Date: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• Previous by thread: Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• Next by thread: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread