• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>, <xml-dev@l...>, "pop3" <lbradshaw@d...>
• Subject: RE: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
• From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@s...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:14:39 -0500
• Thread-index: AcNsSFEi6BlqT8NSSA+MbxA4w6DcpQAZVMQg
• Thread-topic: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)

Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@c...> asks (among many other things):

> * Are there things in the XML world that are equivalent to 
> relational database views, and if so what are they and do 
> they have any advantages? Will xquery change this picture?  
> Would view equivalents make updates easier or harder?

I'd propose that an XPath statement in general can be considered the XML
equivalent to a view...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
    • From: "Bob Foster" <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: The relational model is to data as automata theory is to programs?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
• Next by thread: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread