• To: "'Hunsberger, Peter'" <Peter.Hunsberger@s...>, "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: InkML
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:36:16 -0500

Could be.  Actually, I am hoping the WGs of the graphics 
committees do that.  That means more than the W3C.  The W3C
controls core specs but not the applications.  So it's 
even scarier.  It cross-cultural.  It doesn't have to be 
official; just convenient.  The real problem is that once 
one starts down that path, these can become real datatypes, 
not the kind XML plays on TV.

Life is hot in the ecotones.

len


From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@s...]

Oh, great, now you've gone and given the W3C justification to create
another schema type: coordinate list...

• Prev by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by Date: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Previous by thread: RE: InkML
• Next by thread: RE: InkML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread