• To: "'Robin Berjon'" <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: RE: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P...
• From: "bryan" <bry@i...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:59:05 +0200
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3F41E305.7000800@e...>

> plugins for flash, real player, tcl, java, etc are. some may already
be
> licenced others need to be?
> 
> or is it the ability of the browser to support plugins which has to be
> licenced in which case explorer, mozilla, etc have to be licenced?

So what about iframes?

If the iframe references the media type, flash for example, with a
querystring, querystrings being accessible from within the flash file as
I understand it, then it is possible to control the media embedded
within the browser. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P...
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• References:
  • Re: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P...
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P...
• Next by Date: Re: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P...
• Previous by thread: Re: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P...
• Next by thread: Re: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread