• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:57:14 +1000
• References: <oprstl350fezizxn@localhost> <3F264DFA.7020602@e...> <20030803000417.GF10572@w...> <3F2D8E1B.2090805@a...> <035601c35abc$eea6b4c0$4bc8a8c0@A...> <20030804193021.GG17757@w...>

From: "Liam Quin" <liam@w...>

> I just wanted to rein in on the loose use of "ZIP" a little.

Good point

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• Next by Date: Re: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread