• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>,costello@m...
• Subject: Re: XPath brain teaser
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:09:19 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200308261700.SAA25269@p...>
• References: <3F4B8ED3.20470C69@m...><3F4B8ED3.20470C69@m...>

At 01:00 PM 8/26/2003, David Carlisle wrote:

> > Here's what the XPath 2.0 spec says:
>
>That's what the Xpath 1 spec says as well, so it would be surprising if
>xpath 2 said any different.

Yup. But Roger has a point - this has confused plenty of people with XPath 1.0.

Jonathan 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath brain teaser
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • XPath brain teaser
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: XPath brain teaser
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath brain teaser
• Next by Date: Re: XPath brain teaser
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath brain teaser
• Next by thread: Re: XPath brain teaser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread