• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:45:04 -0700
• Thread-index: AcNhGQGkMURtWTi4TEOiiwoV09u9zwAAeX/w
• Thread-topic: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo; 'xml-dev@l...'
> Subject: RE:  Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is 
> XML Really Extensible?
> 
> Yet the Microsoft browser does have a way to declare 
> semantics based on namespaces, and it doesn't involve RDF or 
> neural nets.  And it does use namespaces to declare in a 
> given document, what the meaningful combinations are.  So it 
> addresses items 1 through 3 by declaration and does assign 
> running code.

This is news to me. Which Microsoft browser is this and what feature of
it are you describing? 

-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Eat right, Exercise, Die anyway.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

 

• Prev by Date: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• Next by Date: Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• Previous by thread: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• Next by thread: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread