• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:37:38 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3F2E858F.5080205@a...>
• References: <oprstl350fezizxn@localhost> <3F264DFA.7020602@e...> <20030803000417.GF10572@w...> <3F2D8E1B.2090805@a...> <20030804000337.GS10572@w...> <3F2E858F.5080205@a...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 05:10:55PM +0100, Alaric B Snell wrote:
> Liam Quin wrote:
> Sorry - wasn't meaning to beat up on you - should have been "How can one 
> compare gzip and ASN.1?" :-)

No problem.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, liam@w..., http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/

• References:
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
    • From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A parentless element that is not the document node - how?
• Next by Date: Re: String interning (Was: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?)
• Previous by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Next by thread: Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread