• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: RDF and RELAX NG
• From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:17:01 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@b...>
• In-reply-to: <r02000000-1026-BC51E06ED43D11D7BC220003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r02000000-1026-BC51E06ED43D11D7BC220003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>It may be very naive of me to think this, but something keeps telling me
>that RELAX NG's patterns and RDF's graphs may be able to talk to each
>other in ways that go well beyond the rdf:parseType attribute or XSLT
>transforms between attribute names in a local vocabulary and the rdf:ID,
>rdf:about, etc.  I suspect (though I'm still working it out, and don't
>know nearly enough to be certain) that RELAX NG annotations could be
>sufficient to provide a complete mapping from an unchanged XML
>vocabulary to a set of RDF graphs.
>  
>

Along these lines, I've been playing around with using RELAXNGCC to 
generate RDF triples (this is exactly the annotation idea you outline 
above).

I've RELAXNGCC annotated the RDF/XML Relaxng schema itself: 
http://www.openhealth.org/RDF/RELAXNGccRDF.rng but unfortunately 
RELAXNGCC doesn't yet implement allow this: "attribute with a complex 
name class is not supported yet" :-(

This schema/parser doesn't yet deal with bagIds or reification... but 
since RELAXNGCC chokes on it, this hardly seems to be its main problem 
:-\ oh well...

Jonathan

• References:
  • RDF and RELAX NG
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: XML web programming using VB
• Next by Date: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
• Previous by thread: RE: RDF and RELAX NG
• Next by thread: Re: RelaxNG question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread