• To: 'Dare Obasanjo' <dareo@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:28:16 -0500

Thanks, Dare.  Yes, infoset plus the schema contributions, 
collections, and complex values.  As the discussion gets 
more focused, the applications of XML (eg, transport) are 
less germane than the theoretical underpinnings.  I share 
the scepticism of scalability, but I note that XML was 
designed as a web application metalanguage, not a giant 
central server db app.  I also don't consider it a one size 
fits all solution.  Still, they say it is extensible. :-)

Perhaps the question is do the theories scale and in what dimensions?

len

From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...]

s/infoset/XPath and XQuery data model/ 

• Prev by Date: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?)
• Previous by thread: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by thread: opposite of infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread