• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:31:08 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r02000000-1026-2F577065D29311D7A2D00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• References: <r02000000-1026-2F577065D29311D7A2D00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>>The creators of XML were wrong. Postelâ??s Law has no exceptions."
> 
> Just to be clear, this is Aaron Swartz's argument, not mine.   I
> disagree with Aaron, but for reasons that are not yet coherent enough to
> post.  I figured his provocation was worth some thought, however.

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-sgml-wg/1997Apr/ and 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-sgml-wg/1997May/ - but only if 
you've got some time to invest.

-- 
Cheers, Tim Bray
         (ongoing fragmented essay: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)

• References:
  • Re: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• Previous by thread: Re: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• Next by thread: RE: Postel's Law Has No Exceptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread