• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, "XML Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RelaxNG question
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:59:40 -0400
• References: <r02000000-1026-E79B773AD1CB11D7A2D00003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

>
> >There is also
> >http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20030123/#section-
> >attribute-node which may require banning attributes without a
> >namespace name.
>
> Now that's pedantry.  I don't think RDF syntax is amenable to XML
> schemas of any variety (maybe with tons of co-occurrence constraints and
> a lot of open models?),

FWIW, RelaxNG can be used to define the RDF/XML syntax.
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-RELAXNG-Schema
(the schema has some errors, but is close). Note that when viewed as compact
RelaxNG, the RDF/XML syntax doesn't seem _all that_ complex.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RelaxNG question
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: RelaxNG question
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Types" of XML (Was Re: XML databaseenviroment using PostgreSQL)
• Next by Date: Re: Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P...
• Previous by thread: RE: RelaxNG question
• Next by thread: Re: RelaxNG question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread