• To: 'John Cowan' <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 16:57:20 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

So the value of The Bible, the works of Shakespeare, Lao Tzu, 
and Hofstadter are zero unless we read them?

Wow.  Get out the xerox machines. If I don't bother 
to read what I am copying, I'm free to sell it.  Finally, 
a defense for the file swappers: you can have the songs, 
and movies but you can't play them.

len


From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]

Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit:

> Hmm.  An interesting insight into the software business: 
> it undervalues the IP of already compiled and sold products 
> enormously.  

Or maybe it assigns the correct use value to unmaintained code: $0.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A parentless element that is not the document node - how?
• Next by Date: Re: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• Previous by thread: XMLURL problem!
• Next by thread: Re: Near and Far (Was RE: A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread