---- Start SpamAssassin results
7.20 points, 7 required;
* 1.2 -- BODY: Message is 0% to 10% HTML
* 6.0 -- RAW: Message text disguised using base-64 encoding
---- End of SpamAssassin results
The original message did not contain plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.
--- Begin Message ---
- To: <rjm@z...>,<xml-dev@l...>
- Subject: RE: xml taxonomy
- From: "Rodriguez, Sergio" <srodriguez@c...>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:44:17 -0600
- Thread-index: AcNsn1yIWDZhV03ETAOaa0/7/s8rmwAGEvO3
- Thread-topic: xml taxonomy
<quote from="Rick Marshall">
<!-- ... --> having a taxonomy of xml may help us to understand
what forms, and when are good for different problems. <!-- ... -->
<!-- ... --> by focusing on well defined sets of xml structures
and their properties we can get the theorems to improve our use and
understanding. <!-- ... -->
<!-- ... --> by understanding the properties and operators that
are valid on these sets we can then see the analogies to other
technologies such as
relational models, markup, etc. <!-- ... -->
</quote>
In its five year-old evolution, XML has grown to be a fundamental
technology in the data/process integration domain in the Internet. I
think, as Rick do, that it is time to produce an XML Taxonomy, based in
computer science theorems and best practices of software engineering.
This will be a formalization of the principles by wich XML will be
elegible to *fit* in certain domains (perhaps a definition of
integration with the relational model, similar as the ISO spec of
SQL/XML).
Cheers,
Sergio RodrÃguez.
<<winmail.dat>> --- End Message ---
|
Cart
