• To: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: InkML
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:53:33 -0400
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE022DC809@h...>

Looking at the spec itself, I find the even better:
<trace id = "id4525abc">
1125 18432'23'43"7"-8 3-5+7  -3+6+2+6 8+3+6:T;+2+4:*T;+3+6+3-6:FF;
</trace>

Which they generously let you reformat as:

<trace id = "id4525abc">
1125  18432
'23  '43
"7  "-8
3  -5
7  -3
6  2
6  8
3  6  :T;
2  4  :  *T;
3  6
3-6  :F  F;
</trace>

http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-InkML-20030806/

Maybe it's time to set up a hall of shame?

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • InkML
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: InkML
• Next by Date: RE: InkML
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: InkML
• Next by thread: RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread