• To: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Subject: Re: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question)
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 13:02:20 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B672352@c...>
• References: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B672352@c...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Jeff Lowery wrote:

> <soapbox>
> The technical complexities of namespaces would virtually go away if
> identifiers were nothing more than short string prefixes attached to each
> and every qualified name (i.e., eliminate namespace scopes), where such
> identifiers are unique, single-purposed, and registered with a central
> naming authority.
> </soapbox>

I think many agree with you, it's just that nobody's willing to sign up 
for the task of running the registry; or at least nobody that everyone 
else is willing to trust.

Hey, I'll do it for $0.00000001 for each instance of a prefix used in 
the field :)  (note absence of word "unique" in prior sentence) -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Question regarding DSD
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>

• References:
  • RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question)
    • From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question)
• Next by Date: Question regarding DSD
• Previous by thread: RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question)
• Next by thread: Question regarding DSD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread