• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>,pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>
• Subject: RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• From: dbexlist <dbexlists@e...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:54:40 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <6.0.0.14.0.20030826111713.01cdd250@n...>
• References: <5.1.1.5.2.20030825145848.02cfc220@m...>

Do you really want me to dust off the textbooks and go look it up?

Regards,

Larry Bradshaw

At 11:18 AM 8/26/2003 -0400, Jonathan Robie wrote:
>At 02:58 PM 8/25/2003, pop3 wrote:
>>Personally, I would like to see XML proofs in line with Knuth's work and 
>>Codd's. Proofs that justify its existence, and define its scope and usefulness.
>
>OK, I'll bite. Which of Codd's proofs did that for the relational model?
>
>Jonathan
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• References:
  • RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>
  • RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: XML and the Relational Model
• Next by Date: Re: XML and the Relational Model (was Re: A standard approach to glueing together ...)
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by thread: XML web programming using VB
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread