• To: "'veillard@r...'" <veillard@r...>
• Subject: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: Paypal))
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:48:56 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

A net server does not a system make. There are businesses where
MS Windows systems are required by procurement, 99.99% of the time.   

Step up to the challenge the middle tier vendors 
have to face every day.  Red Hat is making a lot of money off the 
sweat equity of open source.  Use some of it to 

o  Vette your code 
o  Provide a warranty 

Why not?

len


From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@r...]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Speculation:  The end result could be a 
> breaking up of the Microsoft monopoly on 
> essential facilities for web applications 
> by market forces, not legal forces.  MS 

  It's not a speculation, it's a recognized fact
for 5+ years, c.f. Apache and graph at 
   http://news.netcraft.com/

  Your perception of what most people consider reality is
definitely strange.

  When is your rocket landing back to earth ;-) ?

• Prev by Date: RE: Wiki SVG whiteboard
• Next by Date: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible?
• Previous by thread: Re: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? (WAS RE: Paypal))
• Next by thread: Help with Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread