• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:09:38 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.1.5.2.20030826192416.0231b670@m...>

lbradshaw@d... (pop3) writes:
>I do not feel that a markup language with patched on logic capacity
>can be mathematically shown to be a programming language at all....

XML isn't a programming language.

(You can certainly create programming languages in XML, but I don't
think the XML syntax would affect the provability of those constructs.)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standardapproach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• References:
  • Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
    • From: pop3 <lbradshaw@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPath brain teaser
• Next by Date: Re: XPath brain teaser
• Previous by thread: Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Next by thread: RE: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standardapproach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread