• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
• From: "Scott Parnell" <scottp12@r...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:21:23 -0400
• References: <3F410022.F6599E30@m...> <3F410022.F6599E30@m...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030819112123.00aa4b78@p...> <5.1.1.5.2.20030819125723.030ebc78@m...>

I'm not sure if this meets your definition of an "XML only solution", but
you may want to take a look at what TeraText offers:
http://www.teratext.com.au/index.html

Regards,
Scott

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <lbradshaw@d...>
>
> Ummm, the situation presented is that an XML only solution set can provide
> the needed functionality, response time, and other capabilities.
>
> No worries here that I can do this using a relational DBMS, normal forms,
> etc. But doing it only using XML constructs, and tools specific to XML,
> does not seem doable, reasonable, appropriate or supportable over time.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexlist <dbexlists@e...>

• References:
  • A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: dbexcom <lbradshaw@d...>
  • Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
    • From: lbradshaw@d...

• Prev by Date: RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
• Next by Date: RE: Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question)
• Previous by thread: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
• Next by thread: Re: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread