• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>,"Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...>,"Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@m...>
• Subject: RE: Paypal
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:27:27 -0700
• Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcNimKPsyWPo+SPrRIy6jdZNQt78ZwAAXT7/
• Thread-topic: Paypal

As long as you don't clutter up the list with offtopic screeds it doesn't matter which it is. 

________________________________

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
Sent: Thu 8/14/2003 12:16 PM
To: Dare Obasanjo; Rich Salz; Elliotte Rusty Harold
Cc: Simon St.Laurent; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE:  Paypal



When a technology by definition is 'meaningless', it's
hard to say what is offtopic or merely uncomfortable
when discussing it's development.

len


From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@m...]

Why don't you, Len and the rest take it to comp.risks? I like offtopic
threads as much as everyone else but DANG this is getting a bit much.

• Prev by Date: Re: XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL
• Next by Date: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: Paypal))
• Previous by thread: RE: Paypal
• Next by thread: RE: Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: Paypal))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread