• To: Collin <collin@s...>
• Subject: Re: How did XML Blueberry get its name?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:36:21 -0400
• Cc: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <002601c3576c$f2df70c0$c2f19b3d@collin>
• References: <002601c3576c$f2df70c0$c2f19b3d@collin>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Collin scripsit:

> Could anybody give me an idea about it. Thanks!

Picked more or less at random.  At that time we didn't know if it would be
called XML 1.0.1 or XML 1.1 or XML 2.0 or what.

BTW, I don't seem to be able to send mail to you directly; it always
bounces.  To answer your question about my rotating signatures, the
feature depends on the Unix/Linux facility called a "local domain socket"
and isn't readily implementable on Windows.

-- 
At the end of the Metatarsal Age, the dinosaurs         John Cowan
abruptly vanished. The theory that a single             jcowan@r...
catastrophic event may have been responsible            www.reutershealth.com
has been strengthened by the recent discovery of        www.ccil.org/~cowan
a worldwide layer of whipped cream marking the
Creosote-Tutelary boundary.             --Science Made Stupid

• References:
  • How did XML Blueberry get its name?
    • From: "Collin" <collin@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Web Services Framework Interoperability (Was Re: Web Services Composite Application Framework (WS-CAF))
• Next by Date: Re: more politics
• Previous by thread: Re: How did XML Blueberry get its name?
• Next by thread: RE: Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread